The
Cupchik Theft Offender Spectrum
The
following items, in Tables A and B, derived from the Cupchik
Theft Offender Spectrum*(Version 4) can assist in
distinguishing
Atypical Theft Offenders from the more common Typical Theft Offenders.
(The full version of the Spectrum may provide a more accurate
differentiation.)
The
more items the theft offender could respond to truthfully in the affirmative
in Table A,
and in the negative
in Table B,
the more likely it is that he or she would be a suitable candidate for The
Atypical Theft Offender Intervention Program, and the more likely it
is that the book, Why Honest People Shoplift Or Commit Other Acts Of
Theft, Revised Online Edition, available for
downloading elsewhere on this web site, would be helpful in dealing with
the case in question.
Interpreting
the scoring:
The
greater the number of: ‘Yes’
responses from Table A
and
‘No’
responses from Table B,
the
greater the likelihood that the theft offender is an Atypical or
Mixed-Type of theft offender, and therefore a suitable candidate for the
Atypical Theft Offender Intervention Program.
Occasionally
even
some Typical
Theft Offenders reach a point in their lives that they, also, genuinely
want to cease their theft behavior,
but have very great difficulty doing so. At that point they also may
become suitable candidates for Dr. Cupchik's Atypical Theft
Offender Intervention Program.
Regardless
of how the individual responds to the items in the above tables, all
prospective participants in the Atypical Theft Offender Intervention
Program
should:
(a)
be highly motivated
to uncover the reasons for, and to cease their theft behavior, and
(b)
be willing to become
genuinely involved
in the clinical assessment and/or treatment processes.
Who
May Make Referrals?
Criminal
lawyers, crown attorneys, judges, probation and parole officers, service
organizations dealing with theft offenders, as well as other clinicians
and family physicians may refer prospective clients to the program.
Self-referrals
are also considered.